Still, you have to admit. Cosmo has it pretty damn easy right now. He gets to pretend he's in a monogamous relationship with Brandina while all the while getting permission from her to settle all his emotional issues with other women he develops an attraction too. At the same time, he doesn't seem to have to extend to Brandina any of those same considerations. Brandina initiates a threesome that is directly to the benefit and in service of Cosmo. How cool. He has an attraction to Carol. Perceptive Brandina understands that Cosmo has the unrequited feelings and encourages him to engage them with nary a worry about consequences if the resolution of those issues mean winding up in bed with Carol.

However, at the same time, Brandina is also this completely loyal and faithful girlfriend who only has eyes for Cosmo. You think about it, it is a most conservative conception of free love. Brandina, the free spirit who initiates threesomes does so only to benefit the needs of her man. Have we yet seen an instance where Brandina's head might be turned by, say, the hunchback for "Children of the Night" and turn to Cosmo and say, "Lets take him back to our room, Cosmo. It'll be fun and I kind of wonder what he's like in the sack." Has an old flame of Brandina's turned up for whom she has unrequited passions? Would Cosmo extend to her the same understanding and encouragement to settle her "thing" with this guy that she extends to Cosmo over Carol?

Cosmo has it just a little too good right now because his fealty to Brandina has not been tested. He's just digging the hell out of it that his chick lets him screw around and he can rest easy because she won't.